https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214766 The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) erred in disposing of the appeal ex-parte without proper service of notice and failing to pass a speaking order as required by law. The Tribunal remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing the CIT(A) to provide a reasoned decision on the issues raised in compliance with Section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal requirements and principles of natural justice. en-us Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214766 The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) erred in disposing of the appeal ex-parte without proper service of notice and failing to pass a speaking order as required by law. The Tribunal remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing the CIT(A) to provide a reasoned decision on the issues raised in compliance with Section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal requirements and principles of natural justice. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214766