<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 326 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214753</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the decision of the Ld CIT(A) to delete the addition of interest expenditure paid to specified persons as the Assessing Officer failed to establish the nexus between interest-bearing borrowings and interest-free advances/loans. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequate interest-free funds to provide interest-free loans, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 06:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 326 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214753</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the decision of the Ld CIT(A) to delete the addition of interest expenditure paid to specified persons as the Assessing Officer failed to establish the nexus between interest-bearing borrowings and interest-free advances/loans. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequate interest-free funds to provide interest-free loans, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>