https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214750 The appellate tribunal set aside the Order-in-appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the liability to pay the differential duty for conversion charges in the manufacturing process of finished goods. The tribunal determined that the appellant had already discharged duty liability based on the price provided by the principal manufacturer and that any further addition to the assessable value for products manufactured and cleared by the appellant would be unjustified. The decision was influenced by the precedent established in the case of Surindra Steel Rolling Mills vs. CCE, Chandigarh, as upheld by the Hon'ble High Court of Punjab & Haryana. en-us Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Jul 2012 07:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214750 The appellate tribunal set aside the Order-in-appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the liability to pay the differential duty for conversion charges in the manufacturing process of finished goods. The tribunal determined that the appellant had already discharged duty liability based on the price provided by the principal manufacturer and that any further addition to the assessable value for products manufactured and cleared by the appellant would be unjustified. The decision was influenced by the precedent established in the case of Surindra Steel Rolling Mills vs. CCE, Chandigarh, as upheld by the Hon'ble High Court of Punjab & Haryana. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214750