https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214741 Cross-objections under Section 253(4) of the Income-tax Act could not be rejected mechanically after a limited remand where the earlier High Court order had left open whether notice of the Tribunal proceedings had been served on the assessee. In that situation, the Tribunal was required to examine whether the cross-objections were entertainable under the statute and, if necessary, whether any delay could be condoned. The rejection was therefore unsustainable, and the matter had to be considered on merits in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214741 Cross-objections under Section 253(4) of the Income-tax Act could not be rejected mechanically after a limited remand where the earlier High Court order had left open whether notice of the Tribunal proceedings had been served on the assessee. In that situation, the Tribunal was required to examine whether the cross-objections were entertainable under the statute and, if necessary, whether any delay could be condoned. The rejection was therefore unsustainable, and the matter had to be considered on merits in accordance with law. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214741