<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 304 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214731</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the expenditure claim of Rs. 1,01,33,953. It held that section 40(a)(ia) did not apply to amounts paid during the year and that the Finance Act, 2010 amendment was retrospective, permitting deductions if TDS was deposited before the return filing due date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 18:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 304 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214731</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the expenditure claim of Rs. 1,01,33,953. It held that section 40(a)(ia) did not apply to amounts paid during the year and that the Finance Act, 2010 amendment was retrospective, permitting deductions if TDS was deposited before the return filing due date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>