<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 267 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214692</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal against the additions of gifts received from relatives and the cash deposit in UCO Bank. The decision was based on the evidence presented by the assessee, including affidavits from donors and relevant bank records, which supported the explanations provided. The tribunal found that the revenue authorities failed to provide substantial evidence to challenge the assessee&#039;s claims, ultimately leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 15:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 267 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214692</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal against the additions of gifts received from relatives and the cash deposit in UCO Bank. The decision was based on the evidence presented by the assessee, including affidavits from donors and relevant bank records, which supported the explanations provided. The tribunal found that the revenue authorities failed to provide substantial evidence to challenge the assessee&#039;s claims, ultimately leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>