<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 260 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214685</link>
    <description>The delay in filing applications was condoned, and all applications were allowed. The appellant&#039;s entitlement to Cenvat credit for power generation bartered to Haryana State Electricity Board was upheld based on a previous Division Bench order. The Revenue&#039;s appeals challenging the penalty and adjudication order were dismissed due to lack of substantial reasons against the power bartering motive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 15:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 260 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214685</link>
      <description>The delay in filing applications was condoned, and all applications were allowed. The appellant&#039;s entitlement to Cenvat credit for power generation bartered to Haryana State Electricity Board was upheld based on a previous Division Bench order. The Revenue&#039;s appeals challenging the penalty and adjudication order were dismissed due to lack of substantial reasons against the power bartering motive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>