<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 258 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214683</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellants to deposit Rs. 25 lakhs within eight weeks based on the majority order, with compliance to be reviewed on a specified date. The pre-deposit requirement was imposed due to the Revenue&#039;s strong case for invoking the extended period for demand of service tax, despite a difference of opinion among Members on the amount to be deposited, with one Member suggesting Rs. 3 crores and another advocating for Rs. 25 lakhs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 14:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 258 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214683</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellants to deposit Rs. 25 lakhs within eight weeks based on the majority order, with compliance to be reviewed on a specified date. The pre-deposit requirement was imposed due to the Revenue&#039;s strong case for invoking the extended period for demand of service tax, despite a difference of opinion among Members on the amount to be deposited, with one Member suggesting Rs. 3 crores and another advocating for Rs. 25 lakhs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>