https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214673 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, upholding the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer related to payments to Shri Kalim Akhtar Ansari and job work payable. The matter was restored to the AO for further examination of transactions with Shri Ansari due to lack of confirmed accounts. The Tribunal affirmed the Ld. CIT(A) decision on job work payable, stating that no addition could be made in the current year as the expenditure was not related to that year. en-us Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214673 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, upholding the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer related to payments to Shri Kalim Akhtar Ansari and job work payable. The matter was restored to the AO for further examination of transactions with Shri Ansari due to lack of confirmed accounts. The Tribunal affirmed the Ld. CIT(A) decision on job work payable, stating that no addition could be made in the current year as the expenditure was not related to that year. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214673