<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 244 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214669</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi held that Rule 8D for disallowance under Section 14A is not applicable for AY 2007-08, as it applies from AY 2008-09 onwards per Godrej Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. precedent. The assessee&#039;s self-disallowance of Rs.1,73,98,255 on proportionate basis of exempt dividend income to total income was deemed reasonable and justified. Revenue&#039;s appeal against CIT(A)&#039;s restriction of disallowance was dismissed, with tribunal ruling in favor of assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2025 12:19:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 244 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214669</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi held that Rule 8D for disallowance under Section 14A is not applicable for AY 2007-08, as it applies from AY 2008-09 onwards per Godrej Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. precedent. The assessee&#039;s self-disallowance of Rs.1,73,98,255 on proportionate basis of exempt dividend income to total income was deemed reasonable and justified. Revenue&#039;s appeal against CIT(A)&#039;s restriction of disallowance was dismissed, with tribunal ruling in favor of assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>