<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 243 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214668</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs.1,43,74,590/- made by the AO. It found that the load collected by the asset management company was not its income but belonged to the mutual fund, to be used for specific purposes according to SEBI regulations. The Tribunal concluded that the load amount was not taxable in the hands of the assessee, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 243 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214668</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs.1,43,74,590/- made by the AO. It found that the load collected by the asset management company was not its income but belonged to the mutual fund, to be used for specific purposes according to SEBI regulations. The Tribunal concluded that the load amount was not taxable in the hands of the assessee, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>