<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 235 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214660</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of 10% of dividend income for assessment years 2005-06 to 2007-08, finding the expenditure allocation fair. For assessment year 2009-10, the Tribunal restored the Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance under Rule 8D, emphasizing its mandatory application, despite the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) reducing the disallowance amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 235 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214660</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of 10% of dividend income for assessment years 2005-06 to 2007-08, finding the expenditure allocation fair. For assessment year 2009-10, the Tribunal restored the Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance under Rule 8D, emphasizing its mandatory application, despite the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) reducing the disallowance amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>