<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 226 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214651</link>
    <description>Service tax on discounts and incentives received by an advertising agency from media was held to be covered by earlier orders in the assessee&#039;s own case for prior periods. The Tribunal found the present dispute identical to those earlier matters and saw no reason to depart from the view already taken in favour of the assessee. The issue was accordingly decided against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 18:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 226 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214651</link>
      <description>Service tax on discounts and incentives received by an advertising agency from media was held to be covered by earlier orders in the assessee&#039;s own case for prior periods. The Tribunal found the present dispute identical to those earlier matters and saw no reason to depart from the view already taken in favour of the assessee. The issue was accordingly decided against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>