https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214619 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration, emphasizing the need to verify whether the appellant refrained from availing CENVAT Credit for the Mandap Keeper services. The appeal was allowed for further examination, with no opinion expressed on the case's merits, ensuring the principles of natural justice were followed. en-us Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214619 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration, emphasizing the need to verify whether the appellant refrained from availing CENVAT Credit for the Mandap Keeper services. The appeal was allowed for further examination, with no opinion expressed on the case's merits, ensuring the principles of natural justice were followed. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214619