<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 189 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214614</link>
    <description>Capital-gains taxability under a development agreement depends on whether possession was granted in part performance within the meaning of section 53A, so that the arrangement constitutes a transfer under section 2(47)(v). Where the alleged cancellation agreement, actual possession and development activity remain inadequately examined, the capital-gains issue requires fresh determination. The unexplained opening cash-balance addition also requires verification because acceptance in a cash-flow statement does not establish the availability or source of funds; deletion without necessary enquiry is premature. Both issues were remanded for fresh consideration, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 189 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214614</link>
      <description>Capital-gains taxability under a development agreement depends on whether possession was granted in part performance within the meaning of section 53A, so that the arrangement constitutes a transfer under section 2(47)(v). Where the alleged cancellation agreement, actual possession and development activity remain inadequately examined, the capital-gains issue requires fresh determination. The unexplained opening cash-balance addition also requires verification because acceptance in a cash-flow statement does not establish the availability or source of funds; deletion without necessary enquiry is premature. Both issues were remanded for fresh consideration, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>