<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 186 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214611</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The first issue involved the interpretation of royalty payment and TDS requirements, while the second issue concerned the taxability of studio hire charges under different sections of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal&#039;s detailed analysis and application of relevant provisions resulted in the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal in both instances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 16:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 186 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214611</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The first issue involved the interpretation of royalty payment and TDS requirements, while the second issue concerned the taxability of studio hire charges under different sections of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal&#039;s detailed analysis and application of relevant provisions resulted in the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal in both instances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>