<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 162 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214587</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld that until 1.3.08, the appellant could use Cenvat credit for paying Service Tax on goods transport agency services. After an amendment post 1.3.08, the appellant acknowledged the change and made a cash payment for the outstanding amount. The Tribunal allowed re-crediting the amount in the Cenvat credit account due to the confusion during the transitional period. The penalty imposed was set aside considering the confusion during that period, and the appellant was entitled to re-credit the amount in their Cenvat credit account.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 08:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 162 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214587</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld that until 1.3.08, the appellant could use Cenvat credit for paying Service Tax on goods transport agency services. After an amendment post 1.3.08, the appellant acknowledged the change and made a cash payment for the outstanding amount. The Tribunal allowed re-crediting the amount in the Cenvat credit account due to the confusion during the transitional period. The penalty imposed was set aside considering the confusion during that period, and the appellant was entitled to re-credit the amount in their Cenvat credit account.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>