<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 135 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214560</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding liability of service tax, admissibility of cenvat credit, demand for interest, time-barred claims, verification of tax payment claims, and consideration of judicial precedents. The case was remanded for further adjudication, emphasizing the importance of verifying prior tax payments and considering all relevant legal precedents in tax recovery proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 135 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214560</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding liability of service tax, admissibility of cenvat credit, demand for interest, time-barred claims, verification of tax payment claims, and consideration of judicial precedents. The case was remanded for further adjudication, emphasizing the importance of verifying prior tax payments and considering all relevant legal precedents in tax recovery proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>