<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 117 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214542</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-compute the deduction under Section 10AA and the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) by considering both positive and negative deviations. The request for a 5% tolerance limit was dismissed, and the levy of interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was deemed consequential.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 05:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 117 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214542</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-compute the deduction under Section 10AA and the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) by considering both positive and negative deviations. The request for a 5% tolerance limit was dismissed, and the levy of interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was deemed consequential.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>