<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 112 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214537</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed by way of remand as the Tribunal directed the Commissioner to reconsider the case without insisting on the predeposit requirement. The Tribunal emphasized providing the Appellant with a reasonable opportunity of hearing and keeping all issues open for consideration on their merits, following the precedent set by the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 112 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214537</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed by way of remand as the Tribunal directed the Commissioner to reconsider the case without insisting on the predeposit requirement. The Tribunal emphasized providing the Appellant with a reasonable opportunity of hearing and keeping all issues open for consideration on their merits, following the precedent set by the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>