<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 106 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214531</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant, finding that the activity of arranging celebrities for promotion and publicity did not fall under the category of advertisement agency service. The Tribunal granted a waiver of the entire amount of service tax, interest, and penalties, and stayed the demands during the appeal process. This clarified the tax treatment of the service, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 09:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 106 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214531</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant, finding that the activity of arranging celebrities for promotion and publicity did not fall under the category of advertisement agency service. The Tribunal granted a waiver of the entire amount of service tax, interest, and penalties, and stayed the demands during the appeal process. This clarified the tax treatment of the service, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>