https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214530 Repossession and sale of a financed vehicle under a hire-purchase arrangement must be carried out only in accordance with law; contractual recovery clauses cannot justify self-help seizure by force. Actions contrary to due process or applicable regulatory guidelines are unsustainable. However, where the vehicle has already been sold, third-party rights have intervened, and the borrower has complied with earlier consumer forum directions, substantive interference becomes ineffective and no further operative relief follows. en-us Mon, 14 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Dec 2022 17:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214530 Repossession and sale of a financed vehicle under a hire-purchase arrangement must be carried out only in accordance with law; contractual recovery clauses cannot justify self-help seizure by force. Actions contrary to due process or applicable regulatory guidelines are unsustainable. However, where the vehicle has already been sold, third-party rights have intervened, and the borrower has complied with earlier consumer forum directions, substantive interference becomes ineffective and no further operative relief follows. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 14 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214530