<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 92 - ITAT, Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the issues for the Assessing Officer to decide afresh, emphasizing compliance with Rule 46A and proper examination of evidence. The appeal of the revenue was allowed for statistical purposes, granting the assessee the liberty to file documents before the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 92 - ITAT, Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the issues for the Assessing Officer to decide afresh, emphasizing compliance with Rule 46A and proper examination of evidence. The appeal of the revenue was allowed for statistical purposes, granting the assessee the liberty to file documents before the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>