<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 89 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214514</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal as no substantial question of law was involved. The Tribunal&#039;s decision, based on a factual review, found that disputed flats did not exceed the specified size limit. Regarding the assessment of the built-up area in residential units, the Tribunal independently evaluated the evidence and determined that the built-up area did not exceed the statutory limit. The Court emphasized that these were factual determinations, not legal questions, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without addressing the legal issues raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 08:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 89 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214514</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal as no substantial question of law was involved. The Tribunal&#039;s decision, based on a factual review, found that disputed flats did not exceed the specified size limit. Regarding the assessment of the built-up area in residential units, the Tribunal independently evaluated the evidence and determined that the built-up area did not exceed the statutory limit. The Court emphasized that these were factual determinations, not legal questions, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without addressing the legal issues raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>