<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 87 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214512</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment clarified the interpretation of Section 80-IB(10) and the exclusion of shared common areas from built-up area calculations for tax benefits. Excluding shared balconies made all units compliant with the 1500 sq.ft limit, entitling the assessee to full tax exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 87 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214512</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment clarified the interpretation of Section 80-IB(10) and the exclusion of shared common areas from built-up area calculations for tax benefits. Excluding shared balconies made all units compliant with the 1500 sq.ft limit, entitling the assessee to full tax exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>