<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 74 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214499</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on all specific grounds, allowing the appeal. The treatment of royalty expenditure as revenue expenditure, provision for warranty, air ticket costs for technicians, entry tax paid under protest, and software expenses were all accepted as revenue expenditures. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aligned with previous rulings and relevant High Court judgments, resulting in a favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 74 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214499</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on all specific grounds, allowing the appeal. The treatment of royalty expenditure as revenue expenditure, provision for warranty, air ticket costs for technicians, entry tax paid under protest, and software expenses were all accepted as revenue expenditures. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aligned with previous rulings and relevant High Court judgments, resulting in a favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>