<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 67 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214492</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow expenses and rejected the exemption claim under Section 10(23C)(iiiad). The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) did not properly follow Rule 46A in admitting additional evidence and directed a reconsideration, emphasizing the need for proper verification and recording of reasons. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 67 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214492</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow expenses and rejected the exemption claim under Section 10(23C)(iiiad). The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) did not properly follow Rule 46A in admitting additional evidence and directed a reconsideration, emphasizing the need for proper verification and recording of reasons. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>