<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 63 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214488</link>
    <description>The ITAT affirmed the disallowance of expenditure related to dividend income claimed as exempt under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that Rule 8D was correctly applied, and the assessee could not dispute the computation after providing it. Additionally, the ITAT accepted the condonation petition for the delayed appeal filing, considering the reasons provided as valid and acceptable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 63 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214488</link>
      <description>The ITAT affirmed the disallowance of expenditure related to dividend income claimed as exempt under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that Rule 8D was correctly applied, and the assessee could not dispute the computation after providing it. Additionally, the ITAT accepted the condonation petition for the delayed appeal filing, considering the reasons provided as valid and acceptable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>