<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 37 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214462</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the re-opening of assessments, rejecting the contention that it was a mere change of opinion. However, it ruled that the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source on freight charges paid for hired lorries, setting aside the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia). The appeals were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 19:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 37 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214462</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the re-opening of assessments, rejecting the contention that it was a mere change of opinion. However, it ruled that the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source on freight charges paid for hired lorries, setting aside the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia). The appeals were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>