<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 675 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214458</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s order. It emphasized that the computation of deductions under Section 80HHD should be based on the overall profits of the business, including all units. The court clarified that the principle of merger does not apply to aspects not appealed, allowing the Assessing Officer to rectify the order under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 07:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 675 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214458</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s order. It emphasized that the computation of deductions under Section 80HHD should be based on the overall profits of the business, including all units. The court clarified that the principle of merger does not apply to aspects not appealed, allowing the Assessing Officer to rectify the order under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>