<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 11 - ITAT, Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214435</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the initiation of proceedings under Section 158BD of the Income Tax Act, finding the notice was validly issued. However, additions for undisclosed expenditure, suppression of receipts, and illegal payments were deleted due to lack of evidence. The charge of interest under Section 220(2) was dismissed. The appeal by the assessee was partially allowed, while the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 11:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 11 - ITAT, Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214435</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the initiation of proceedings under Section 158BD of the Income Tax Act, finding the notice was validly issued. However, additions for undisclosed expenditure, suppression of receipts, and illegal payments were deleted due to lack of evidence. The charge of interest under Section 220(2) was dismissed. The appeal by the assessee was partially allowed, while the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>