<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 9 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214433</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all four appeals by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal reiterated that penalties are not warranted when the assessee&#039;s explanations are not found to be false and all necessary facts are disclosed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 9 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214433</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all four appeals by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal reiterated that penalties are not warranted when the assessee&#039;s explanations are not found to be false and all necessary facts are disclosed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>