<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 7 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214431</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the assessees were not liable to pay interest under Section 234B due to the payer&#039;s failure to deduct tax at source under Section 195. The Tribunal emphasized that the obligation to deduct tax lies with the payer, and in case of default, the non-resident is liable to pay tax but not advance tax. Therefore, no interest under Section 234B could be imposed on the non-resident assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 7 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214431</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the assessees were not liable to pay interest under Section 234B due to the payer&#039;s failure to deduct tax at source under Section 195. The Tribunal emphasized that the obligation to deduct tax lies with the payer, and in case of default, the non-resident is liable to pay tax but not advance tax. Therefore, no interest under Section 234B could be imposed on the non-resident assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>