<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 706 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214407</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all three issues. Network development expenses were treated as revenue expenditure, various business expenses disallowance was deleted, and the addition on account of courier charges was also deleted. The Tribunal stressed the need for concrete evidence and proper procedural enforcement in disallowances and additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 706 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214407</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all three issues. Network development expenses were treated as revenue expenditure, various business expenses disallowance was deleted, and the addition on account of courier charges was also deleted. The Tribunal stressed the need for concrete evidence and proper procedural enforcement in disallowances and additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>