https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214391 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees in a case involving various demands. The demand for Civil Work and Electrical Work charges was considered time-barred and unsustainable. A payment discrepancy in Erection Charges led to only Rs.4 lakhs being outstanding, with the pre-deposit requirement waived. TNEB Infrastructure Charges were waived due to the assessees paying on behalf of clients. The challenge regarding Land Development Charges was supported by a prima facie case, leading to the pre-deposit requirement being waived. Overall, the assessees were unconditionally granted a waiver for demands, pre-deposit, tax, interest, and penalty during the appeal's pendency. en-us Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Dec 2014 11:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214391 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees in a case involving various demands. The demand for Civil Work and Electrical Work charges was considered time-barred and unsustainable. A payment discrepancy in Erection Charges led to only Rs.4 lakhs being outstanding, with the pre-deposit requirement waived. TNEB Infrastructure Charges were waived due to the assessees paying on behalf of clients. The challenge regarding Land Development Charges was supported by a prima facie case, leading to the pre-deposit requirement being waived. Overall, the assessees were unconditionally granted a waiver for demands, pre-deposit, tax, interest, and penalty during the appeal's pendency. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214391