<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 665 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214362</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai granted waiver of predeposit of service tax, interest, and penalty to the appellant as the services provided were considered to fall under Erection, Commissioning, and Installation Service, not Consulting Engineering Service. The demand was confirmed, but authorities did not provide a prima facie finding on how the service would be classified as Consulting Engineering Service. Recovery of amounts in dispute was stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 665 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214362</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai granted waiver of predeposit of service tax, interest, and penalty to the appellant as the services provided were considered to fall under Erection, Commissioning, and Installation Service, not Consulting Engineering Service. The demand was confirmed, but authorities did not provide a prima facie finding on how the service would be classified as Consulting Engineering Service. Recovery of amounts in dispute was stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>