https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214358 Examination instructions, solutions and evaluation material may be treated as protected intellectual property and confidential fiduciary information under the RTI Act, but the exemptions are not absolute. Disclosure under section 8(1)(d) depends on whether release would prejudice competitive interests, so post-examination disclosure may no longer be barred on that ground. Section 9 does not justify refusal where the material is owned by the examining body and disclosure does not amount to copyright infringement in substance. The body must disclose any standard moderation criteria maintained under Regulation 39(2), but it is not required to create or supply information not already existing in its records. en-us Fri, 02 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Mar 2025 18:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214358 Examination instructions, solutions and evaluation material may be treated as protected intellectual property and confidential fiduciary information under the RTI Act, but the exemptions are not absolute. Disclosure under section 8(1)(d) depends on whether release would prejudice competitive interests, so post-examination disclosure may no longer be barred on that ground. Section 9 does not justify refusal where the material is owned by the examining body and disclosure does not amount to copyright infringement in substance. The body must disclose any standard moderation criteria maintained under Regulation 39(2), but it is not required to create or supply information not already existing in its records. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214358