https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214339 The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine to Rs.3.5 lakhs and set aside the penalty of Rs.5 lakhs, aligning with an earlier decision involving the same appellant. The goods, not meeting standards under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, were liable for confiscation. The Tribunal considered the importer's lack of involvement in the non-compliance and reliance on the foreign supplier's certificate, leading to the reduction of the fine and setting aside of the penalty. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, emphasizing adherence to quality standards in imports and the imposition of fines and penalties based on importer's involvement and intent. en-us Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214339 The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine to Rs.3.5 lakhs and set aside the penalty of Rs.5 lakhs, aligning with an earlier decision involving the same appellant. The goods, not meeting standards under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, were liable for confiscation. The Tribunal considered the importer's lack of involvement in the non-compliance and reliance on the foreign supplier's certificate, leading to the reduction of the fine and setting aside of the penalty. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, emphasizing adherence to quality standards in imports and the imposition of fines and penalties based on importer's involvement and intent. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214339