<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 643 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214338</link>
    <description>The court found in favor of the petitioner and granted them four weeks to deposit the invoice amounts in court. If the respondent failed to comply, the winding-up petition would be admitted, and an advertisement for winding up would be published. The court concluded that the respondent&#039;s disputes were not genuine and were raised belatedly, indicating lack of bona fides. The case was adjourned for further consideration to 30th April 2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 643 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214338</link>
      <description>The court found in favor of the petitioner and granted them four weeks to deposit the invoice amounts in court. If the respondent failed to comply, the winding-up petition would be admitted, and an advertisement for winding up would be published. The court concluded that the respondent&#039;s disputes were not genuine and were raised belatedly, indicating lack of bona fides. The case was adjourned for further consideration to 30th April 2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>