<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 640 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214335</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, holding that the scrap remnants from cutting new plates and pipes for replacement in a chemical plant do not attract duty liability. The Commissioner (Appeals) overturned the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decision, determining that the scrap did not arise from a manufacturing process but from the replacement of worn-out parts. The Tribunal emphasized that the nature of the scrap (re-rollable or melting) is irrelevant for duty levy if it did not result from a manufacturing process, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal for duty payment on the scrap.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 640 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214335</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, holding that the scrap remnants from cutting new plates and pipes for replacement in a chemical plant do not attract duty liability. The Commissioner (Appeals) overturned the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decision, determining that the scrap did not arise from a manufacturing process but from the replacement of worn-out parts. The Tribunal emphasized that the nature of the scrap (re-rollable or melting) is irrelevant for duty levy if it did not result from a manufacturing process, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal for duty payment on the scrap.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>