<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 635 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214329</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed all appeals by remanding the cases to the original authorities. The Tribunal directed a re-examination of the nexus between input and output services, consideration of Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificates, and ensured a fair opportunity for all parties to present their cases, addressing objections on time-barred claims. The Tribunal also clarified the applicability of limitation to refund claims, allowing parties to present relevant case law and evidence. The Commissioner (Appeals) initially remanded the cases, but the Tribunal confirmed the lack of jurisdiction for remand, yet proceeded based on valid reasons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 08:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 635 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214329</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed all appeals by remanding the cases to the original authorities. The Tribunal directed a re-examination of the nexus between input and output services, consideration of Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificates, and ensured a fair opportunity for all parties to present their cases, addressing objections on time-barred claims. The Tribunal also clarified the applicability of limitation to refund claims, allowing parties to present relevant case law and evidence. The Commissioner (Appeals) initially remanded the cases, but the Tribunal confirmed the lack of jurisdiction for remand, yet proceeded based on valid reasons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>