<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 634 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214328</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the overriding effect of Rule 6(5) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, allowing full credit on specified services. The demand for excess CENVAT credit under Rule 6(3) was deemed legally unsustainable. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the demand, penalties, and interest imposed on the appellant, granting relief in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 15:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 634 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214328</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the overriding effect of Rule 6(5) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, allowing full credit on specified services. The demand for excess CENVAT credit under Rule 6(3) was deemed legally unsustainable. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the demand, penalties, and interest imposed on the appellant, granting relief in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>