<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 631 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214325</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the allowance of interest u/s.244A on self-assessment tax refund, citing precedents from various High Courts and the Mumbai Bench of Tribunal. It ruled against the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding the decision in line with previous rulings. Additionally, the Tribunal decided that no interest could be charged u/s.234D for A.Y. 2001-02 based on a Special Bench decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on this issue. Regarding the claim of interest on interest u/s.244A for delayed refund, the Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to allow interest on interest in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Sandvik Asia Ltd. vs. CIT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 631 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214325</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the allowance of interest u/s.244A on self-assessment tax refund, citing precedents from various High Courts and the Mumbai Bench of Tribunal. It ruled against the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding the decision in line with previous rulings. Additionally, the Tribunal decided that no interest could be charged u/s.234D for A.Y. 2001-02 based on a Special Bench decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on this issue. Regarding the claim of interest on interest u/s.244A for delayed refund, the Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to allow interest on interest in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Sandvik Asia Ltd. vs. CIT.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>