<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 608 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214301</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the lack of evidence supporting the application of the extended period of limitation for recovering unpaid duty. The Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, stating that once the necessary facts for the extended period of limitation are established, the timing of initiating proceedings becomes irrelevant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 608 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214301</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the lack of evidence supporting the application of the extended period of limitation for recovering unpaid duty. The Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, stating that once the necessary facts for the extended period of limitation are established, the timing of initiating proceedings becomes irrelevant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>