<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 596 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214289</link>
    <description>Land is treated as agricultural for capital gains purposes when contemporaneous revenue records and competent-authority findings show continued cultivation, even if purchase bills for seeds, fertilisers or insecticides are unavailable. Adangal entries, returns describing the land as agricultural, and the revenue authority&#039;s certificate supported agricultural user, while the levy of urban land tax did not by itself change the land&#039;s character. On those facts, the land did not fall within the definition of capital asset under Section 2(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the surplus on sale was not chargeable to long-term capital gains tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 596 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214289</link>
      <description>Land is treated as agricultural for capital gains purposes when contemporaneous revenue records and competent-authority findings show continued cultivation, even if purchase bills for seeds, fertilisers or insecticides are unavailable. Adangal entries, returns describing the land as agricultural, and the revenue authority&#039;s certificate supported agricultural user, while the levy of urban land tax did not by itself change the land&#039;s character. On those facts, the land did not fall within the definition of capital asset under Section 2(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the surplus on sale was not chargeable to long-term capital gains tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>