<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 591 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214284</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed due to a significant delay of 923 days in filing the appeal against the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) refused to condone the delay, finding insufficient cause. The appeal challenging the assessment order under the Income-tax Act was dismissed on its merits, upholding additions for unexplained bank deposits. The Tribunal affirmed these decisions, emphasizing the lack of merit in the grounds raised by the assessee. The validity of the assessment under sections 144 and 153A was questioned, along with the Tribunal&#039;s powers to interpret orders under section 250. The sustainability of additions based on unexplained bank deposits was also scrutinized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 591 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214284</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed due to a significant delay of 923 days in filing the appeal against the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) refused to condone the delay, finding insufficient cause. The appeal challenging the assessment order under the Income-tax Act was dismissed on its merits, upholding additions for unexplained bank deposits. The Tribunal affirmed these decisions, emphasizing the lack of merit in the grounds raised by the assessee. The validity of the assessment under sections 144 and 153A was questioned, along with the Tribunal&#039;s powers to interpret orders under section 250. The sustainability of additions based on unexplained bank deposits was also scrutinized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>