<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 578 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214266</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed all seven appeals filed by the appellant, upholding the denial of Cenvat credit for various services except for canteen services. The tribunal found that the appellant was not entitled to Cenvat credit on services such as maintenance, repairs, technical inspection, survey, manpower recruitment, ship fees, mobile phones, insurance, and rent a cab based on previous decisions and legal interpretations. The tribunal also upheld the applicability of Section 11A of the Central Excise Act for recovery of Cenvat credit used for excise duty on final products, dismissing the appellant&#039;s objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 578 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214266</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed all seven appeals filed by the appellant, upholding the denial of Cenvat credit for various services except for canteen services. The tribunal found that the appellant was not entitled to Cenvat credit on services such as maintenance, repairs, technical inspection, survey, manpower recruitment, ship fees, mobile phones, insurance, and rent a cab based on previous decisions and legal interpretations. The tribunal also upheld the applicability of Section 11A of the Central Excise Act for recovery of Cenvat credit used for excise duty on final products, dismissing the appellant&#039;s objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>