<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 568 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214256</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the CIT(A) to decide on the set-off of brought forward losses against business income. The disallowance of interest under Section 14A in respect of exempt income from dividends was upheld, citing that no deduction was allowable for interest expenditure related to exempt income. The Tribunal found the Proviso to Section 14A inapplicable due to the nature of the notice issued by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 568 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214256</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the CIT(A) to decide on the set-off of brought forward losses against business income. The disallowance of interest under Section 14A in respect of exempt income from dividends was upheld, citing that no deduction was allowable for interest expenditure related to exempt income. The Tribunal found the Proviso to Section 14A inapplicable due to the nature of the notice issued by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>