<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 552 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214240</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning service tax liability on freight paid by consignment agents on behalf of the appellants. The Tribunal found that the consignment agents had paid the freight amounts themselves and were therefore liable to pay the service tax. As a result, the demands raised against the appellants were deemed unsustainable, and the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing all the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 552 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214240</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning service tax liability on freight paid by consignment agents on behalf of the appellants. The Tribunal found that the consignment agents had paid the freight amounts themselves and were therefore liable to pay the service tax. As a result, the demands raised against the appellants were deemed unsustainable, and the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing all the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>