<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 539 - Gujarat High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214227</link>
    <description>The High Court held that a Hindu undivided family (HUF) is not a fictional entity but a group of individuals related by blood, allowing an HUF to claim the benefit under section 23(2) of the Income-tax Act. The court ruled in favor of the assessee (HUF), directing the Revenue to bear the costs. This decision clarified that the relief under section 23(2) is available to HUFs based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=187623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 539 - Gujarat High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214227</link>
      <description>The High Court held that a Hindu undivided family (HUF) is not a fictional entity but a group of individuals related by blood, allowing an HUF to claim the benefit under section 23(2) of the Income-tax Act. The court ruled in favor of the assessee (HUF), directing the Revenue to bear the costs. This decision clarified that the relief under section 23(2) is available to HUFs based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>